Only "partisan hysterics" say that the President broke the law. Serious people -- who appreciate the weighty issues of terrorism which confront the President -- politely say that the program "is at least in considerable tension with federal law" and that it rests on "ever-more uncertain legal ground." What matters is not ensuring that there are consequences for the President's deliberate law-breaking when spying on Americans without judicial approval, but instead, that we "provide firmer legal footing for such surveillance."Let me take this opportunity to inform the overtly fascist, idiotic, Wall-Street-Journal-Ed-Board-stupid, non-reportorial, earthshattering-story-suppressing, useless rag of a non-paper that isn't worth wiping your ass with that they're a bunch of Cheney-sucking, Bush-fellating, Abu-Gonzalez-ball-licking, frightened, conscienceless, witless, authority-worshipping Republican butt puppets. Oh, and they're a gang of CIA-controlled Bushbotic flag-worshipping Drano-drinkers who lack even the rudimentary remains of Terri Schiavo's rotting cerebral cortex.
How's that for some blogofascistic, hysterical, below-the-Beltway hate speech? Motherfucker.